UNHEALTHY MODERNITY

IF ALL IS WELL WITH OUR WORLD, WHY DO WE SPEND SO MUCH ON HEALTH CARE?

For decades, Afrikans have been told that the massive size of a nation’s healthcare budget is a great indicator of how well developed that country is. For instance, we’re told that the US spends about $1 trillion a year on healthcare for their citizens. They are actually the biggest spender (per 2019 figures) on healthcare globally, followed by Switzerland, Norway and Germany. 1 trillion dollars. That’s a huge amount of money. And this gargantuan sum goes to machines, drugs, costs of hospitalization (doctors, nurses, hospital beds, surgeries and so on) … and this is meant to be indicative of a nation that can take care of its citizens’ needs. However, doesn’t that massive budget simply mean that a huge number of Americans are just in poor health?

The statistics on healthsystemtracker.org are an indicator that big budgets and modern medical facilities and pharmaceuticals may not be all that great: “Before the pandemic, mortality and disease burden rates were already worse in the U.S. than in peer countries. … the U.S. has one of the highest rates of all-cause excess mortality in 2020 among this group of similar countries… Life expectancy in the U.S. had increased by 5 years over the past 4 decades, although there have been declines in recent years driven by increased mortality rates from certain causes including drug overdoses and suicides. On average, people in comparable countries have a life expectancy of 82.4 years – nearly four years longer than the U.S. life expectancy of 78.7 years – and the gap could grow… Additionally, the U.S. has relatively high rates of disease burden attributable to some of the health conditions that put people at high risk of serious illness from COVID-19: cardiovascular diseases, chronic respiratory diseases, and diabetes.”

What are we missing?

So, then what are we missing here? The world system says that it has increased its focus on improving health globally. Good health and well-being is Goal Number 3 on the 17 point United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) list. In full, Goal Number 3 is stated as: “Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages” and it has 13 aims, which include: reducing global maternal mortality, ending preventable deaths of newborns and children under the age of 5, ending the AIDS, TB, malaria epidemics, ensuring universal access to sexual and reproductive health-care services, achieving universal health coverage, increasing health financing, strengthening capacity for management of national and global health risks and so on. Some of these aims have a target date of the year 2030, which is why you have likely been hearing your government talking about universal health coverage, maternal deaths, infant death prevention and malaria a lot in the last six years. According to the UNDP website, the SDGs are “a universal call to action to end poverty, protect the planet, and ensure that by 2030 all people enjoy peace and prosperity.”

According to the WHO, “Two years into the Sustainable Development Goals era, global spending on health continues to rise. It was US$ 7.8 trillion in 2017, or about 10% of GDP and $1,080 per capita – up from US$ 7.6 trillion in 2016.” What’s interesting about this is that just a few years before the launch of the SDGs, consulting firm, McKinsey, released a report called ‘Supply and Demand Strategies for Lowering Spending on Hospitals’ in which they said: “In most health systems, hospitals account for the largest component of spending (often 40 percent to 50 percent of the outlay). Thus, any health system that wants to control costs – a necessity, given that health care budgets around the world are being squeezed – must find ways to curb its spending on hospitals.” The paper was published in 2010 and the Sustainable Development Goals, which urged increased spending on health systems, were launched in 2015; while policy discussions around the SDGs had already begun by 2011, as the UN needed a follow-on program for when the Millennium Development Goals lapsed in 2015. McKinsey states on its website that it is a strategic partner that supports the World Economic Forum’s mission of ‘improving the state of the world.’ Healthcare Systems and Services are one of the, what they call, ‘Industries’ they are involved in.

Investopedia defined industries in this way: “An industry is a group of companies that are related based on their primary business activities. In modern economies, there are dozens of industry classifications. Industry classifications are typically grouped into larger categories called sectors.

Individual companies are generally classified into an industry based on their largest sources of revenue. For example, while an automobile manufacturer might have a financing division that contributes 10% to the firm’s overall revenues, the company would be classified in the automaker industry by most classification systems.”

Leave No One Behind

You already know that health is classified as being profit-oriented as opposed to being care focused. Some in the health industry in Kenya have learnt this firsthand by taking on American investors and watching them change their operations to suit the profit motive. For a profit-focused hospital or medical facility, this means that they need to find ways in which to increase revenues, while managing how much they spend. What is curious is why, after McKinsey’s recommendations about cost reductions and the methods for how countries could go about this (which I will share later), did the WHO and UN and nations of the world change course from ‘health care budgets around the world are being squeezed’ to a direction that would ensure increased spending in healthcare and on healthcare systems in countries around the world, by the year 2030? All the while using as an entreaty, a principle they call Leave No One Behind (LNOB). A term reminiscent of US military ethos.

So, what was this shift in healthcare spending really about? Making money for pharmaceutical companies, manufacturers of hospital equipment and construction companies and all those in related value chains? Did the McKinsey report hint at something to come like maybe a global plan by the World Economic Forum and its partners to move people off heavy spending on healthcare and healthcare systems at some point in the future? Could this plan have been deferred, by all the parties involved, to the year 2030, where it can be rolled out after the heavy anti-health campaign that is currently running across the world? Perhaps after the infrastructure for remote delivery of treatments via nanotechnology has been rolled out to all citizens of the world? The anti-health campaign I’m referring to goes beyond Covid. The global vaccination campaign existed before this and is wreaking considerable havoc in human health, even for the unborn. So is the use of RoundUp and other herbicides as well as chemical fertilizers and pesticides. In addition, there is the sugar industry, the processed foods industry, the ‘health supplements’ industry, the fast-food industry, the pharmaceutical industry and certain other aspects of allopathic ‘care’ and the fitness industry that cause more harm than good – among all the other games that are being played on human beings that result in $1 trillion price tags on health.

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development states, in paragraph 4: “As we embark on this great collective journey, we pledge that no one will be left behind. Recognizing that the dignity of the human person is fundamental, we wish to see the Goals and targets met for all nations and peoples and for all segments of society. And we will endeavour to reach the furthest behind first.” This paragraph captures the second principle they are using i.e., ‘reaching the furthest behind first.’ Recently, the UN shifted the timeline for universal vaccination from 2020 to 2030, in order to ‘leave no one behind’ as their intended goals for global vaccination had not been sufficiently met. This was before Covid. You have to know that the ones being called ‘furthest behind’ are those in Afrika and other lands that have been subject to global economic manipulations. Manipulations which have ensured that these nations do not rise up and make any real moves towards transformation that do not fit the global script.

As we see from this quote taken from a guest article by Pytrik Dieuwke Oosterhof, Sustainable Development Expert, published on sdg.iisd.org, the SDGs, by late 2019, had not delivered as expected. He says that: “The SDG Summit in September 2019 called progress to date insufficient, and analyses pointed to stagnation in efforts to address SDG 2 (zero hunger), SDG 13 (climate action) and SDG 10 (reducing inequalities). The COVID-19 pandemic has added further challenges for making progress on the SDGs. Poverty, hunger, and inequalities have increased around the world. Economic growth has also moved in reverse. During the July 2020 session of the UN High-level Political Forum for Sustainable Development (HLPF), UN Secretary-General António Guterres told the international community that COVID-19 could set us back years and even decades, leaving countries with massive fiscal and growth challenges at a time when a “leap ahead” is desperately needed.  He also stated that, had implementation of the 2030 Agenda been further advanced, the world would have been more resilient and better prepared to respond to the challenges posed by the global health emergency.”  Take note of the language and of its correlation to the WEF language around the ‘Great’ Reset.

Let’s be real, if the world really wanted to end inequality, they would stop the inequality with just as much fervor and speed as they have used manufactured these clot-causing, DNA-altering, GMO-creating jabs they are trying to force on us – because they own and manipulate the sources of inequality on the earth. Bill Gates said this in 2010: “Now, we put out a lot of carbon dioxide every year — over 26 billion tons. For each American, it’s about 20 tons. For people in poor countries, it’s less than one ton. It’s an average of about five tons for everyone on the planet.” He clearly says that the major sources of carbon dioxide emissions, plastic waste and other issues that are affecting our environment and/or our health do not come from Afrika. If they are sincere about equality, then solving these problems therefore should be done at the source, instead of applying pressure on Afrikan economies to comply with emissions requirements that are the result of pollution by western and eastern economies. Although their claims about the environment I really don’t believe. God wasn’t confused when He created oxygen inhaling – carbon dioxide exhaling humans, animals and plants.

Keep in mind that the September 2019 summit Pytrik mentions, was held before Covid was announced to the world and one month before Event 201, the ‘simulation’ for a global high-level pandemic. The world was actually ticking along at a relatively predictable, relatively stable rate, and if genuine efforts had been applied to improve conditions, they would have been felt – instead of this madcap plan of introducing a lab-originated virus on the earth in order to create chaos. Anyway, Pytrik goes on to say that, “The 193 countries that adopted the 2030 Agenda on 25 September 2015 did not anticipate the acute need that the global community now has for a shared framework through which to address multiple challenges simultaneously and in all corners of the globe. Aligning COVID-19 response and recovery efforts with the SDGs can help to address today’s challenges while also building more inclusive economies within sustainable and resilient societies. This requires considerable commitment and solidarity across and at all levels of society, and adopting the 2030 Agenda as a blueprint for recovery.”

It is odd that he says that the countries ‘did not anticipate’ such a challenge, because the WHO set up a Health Emergencies Program (WHE) in July 2016 at the request of the World Health Assembly after the slow response to the 2014-15 Ebola outbreak and the WHO had anticipated that the next pandemic would be influenza based. Furthermore, according to the WHO website, “WHE continues to work with Member States to strengthen prevention, surveillance, and response capacities for seasonal and zoonotic influenza with pandemic potential.” So, it was anticipated and expected and prepared for a minimum of 3 years before it ‘started’. And as we know from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s close-knit relationship with the UN and the WHO (GAVI having been set up in the year 2000), Bill Gates must have been active in briefing the global bodies about his predictions of an expected worldwide pandemic, which he had been sounding off on since 2010. In 2015 he is quoted as saying: ““If anything kills over 10 million people in the next few decades, it’s most likely to be a highly infectious virus rather than a war.” He continued, “You can have a virus where people feel well enough while they’re infectious that they get on a plane or they go to a market.” (Sound familiar?) In light of this, Pytrik’s comments appear to be more like priming for the call that will likely be sounded soon for the implementation of greater ‘frameworks’ in healthcare globally. Just what these will entail, remains to be seen. Although, based on the way this Covid plan has been handled and on Karl Schwab’s agenda and book, we can likely figure that out.

Back to Health

WHO, in 1948, defined health as: “A state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.” Dr. Jack Githae, Afrikan Natural and Traditional Medicine Practitioner defines it this way: “Spirituality: health means being at par with the expectation of the Creator, within the ecosystem He put you in. Period. They are inseparable. In our culture, the diet, interaction with people and spirituality are inseparable. Then there’s the family dynamics. The Afrikan family dynamic is therapeutic. … violence is a sign of sickness. I think the traditional mode of life and mode of interaction have to come up and you need model centers where you have these integrated traditional dynamics at play, where people can break away for a weekend and taste it and live it actualize it, learn it and go propagate it.” I like his definition better. 

Let’s look at the infamous Bill Gates quote from his 2010 Innovate to Zero TED Talk: “The world today has 6.8 billion people, that’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%.” Each one of the items on his list of things they could do a ‘really great job’ on is connected directly to the health care industry. How will new vaccines, health care and reproductive health services reduce human carbon dioxide emissions, except if the humans producing the carbon dioxide are the ones who will be reduced by these ‘health’ interventions? Vaccines, which cause reduced fertility or eliminate it altogether and whose side effects can even include death (yes, even in the non-covid ones); health care that is actually not really care but is something that is designed to reduce the human lifespan as we have seen in allopathic medicine over the years, and drugs that are released by pharmaceutical companies that affect the human body in horrible ways, including death; reproductive health services that prevent new life from even arriving on earth by preventing conception or even by causing fetal death (via abortions and miscarriages). As of 2011, 1.5 billion babies, worldwide, had been murdered via abortion in the preceding 50-year period.

These interventions that Gates talks about, by themselves are responsible for increased doctor visits and hospitalizations due to cancers, heart disease, diabetes, Alzheimer’s, autism, high or low blood pressure, infertility, premature deliveries, intestinal blockages, asthma, eczema, facial paralysis, allergies, blood clots, strokes and all sorts of auto-immune diseases. These interventions alone drive up the amount of money being spent on health ‘care’ in the so-called developed countries and trigger a cyclical need for medical ‘care’ due to the side effects of the drugs being given, or the deliberately designed inability, or rather unwillingness, to provide real and effective cures. A medical doctor from a western country has confessed to being told by her colleague that a certain treatment could not be rolled out because it actually worked and as a result, it would put the doctors out of a job. The concept of modern health care is an illusion that was created by the ‘developed’ world to hold the rest of the world at ransom. It is not real. It is a business that is designed to make people sick enough to need constant help, yet strong enough to go to work from time to time. It is a business that is designed to make people fearful of death and disease to the extent that they will accept the option of slavery; having their liberties taken away and their safety compromised. It is a tool used to force countries and continents that are growing to waste money and time on initiatives that are not actually beneficial in the long run. It is a manufactured lie which, like with the ‘inequalities’ the UN says it wants to eliminate from the world, can so easily be turned around to genuinely protect and sustain actual health throughout the individual’s lifespan and to ensure that the populations of the world would be thriving and growing for ages to come.

See Also

COVID HAS A CURE

The Higher Path

So, you can see why the concept of good health, as Dr. Githae describes it, is not a welcome one in a world that is lying about its real intentions for its citizens. Dr. Githae had this to say about the curative approach in medicine, “I have been in this line now for 50 years. I am changing, for the remaining years I want to go more into preventive medicine rather than curative. The curative approach is primitive. You wait until people are sick and they come to you. Preventive helps people keep away the diseases (and) live longer.

Our people managed to survive without hospitals, just like animals in Mt. Kenya do. They have no vets in Mt. Kenya and the Aberdares, yet elephants, giraffes, the zebras, are healthier than our cattle, because they eat right, they adapt their diet to changing needs and circumstances and instinctively they know what to eat, and what not to eat at given times. Our people managed to keep the disease-burden low because they had a habit of taking herbal tonic soups. (In) Every family, even in your own setting, there must be somebody who once in a while would go for some herbal material, buy some bones, make soup, (and) children were given forcefully, literally.”

The curative approach is primitive! Yet this is the approach the whole world has embraced. You wait for people to get sick and then you treat them. Or you find ways in which to sneak toxins and poisons into their systems, all the while telling them it’s for their own good – like fluoride in drinking water – and then you watch them and their successive generations get sick and come to you and your generations for treatment, for the rest of their lives. It’s a great business plan. This is the real reason why the Amish community in the US is victimized for its organic products that it tries to make available to other people. They are actually passing on health, healing and immunity to people who the globalists are trying to weaken and sicken and kill.

This is why it might surprise you to learn that in the McKinsey report I mentioned earlier in this article, this WEF-affiliated body spoke about: “Three promising ways to avoid the need for hospitalization are prevention programs, Disease Management Programs (DMPs), and greater patient involvement in treatment.

Prevention programs… are designed to keep healthy people from becoming sick or injured… DMPs are predicated on a simple idea: the better chronic diseases are managed in an outpatient setting; the less likely patients are to need hospitalization. Greater patient involvement can reduce hospitalization rates only when alternative treatments are available and have proved to provide equal or better outcomes (ideally, at lower cost).” They also have this to say about the use of decision aids as a tool for reducing hospitalizations (decision aids are materials that provide patients with more information about the risk and benefits associated with a treatment). “Decision aids are particularly useful for patients contemplating elective surgery.

Considerable evidence suggests that these patients often overestimate the benefits of surgery and do not fully comprehend the risks or the alternative treatments they could consider.”

I really wonder how this document even got written. It seems impossible and unlikely in today’s world that there would be a consulting agency of the size and nature of McKinsey, proposing that keeping healthy people from becoming sick or injured would be a great way to resolve the cost of healthcare. But they did. The question is, why did the world not follow through on it, with all strength? Why did they instead turn around and increase their efforts towards the provision of primitive care? I don’t have the answers for this right now, but what I would say is, let Afrika chart its own course.

Thankfully, much of the western way of doing medicine and much of western lifestyle has not permeated Afrika in the way that it could have, for various reasons. So, we are left with the higher pathway for Afrika to use: the route of prevention.

How we do that is through reconnecting with our Creator and His order of things; reconnecting with one another in love, reconnecting to the environment as was intended; reconnecting to the accurate diets and lifestyles we are supposed to embrace. We do it by cleaning up what we have destroyed and replanting and restoring what has been taken down or killed, like our soils. For those who have fallen victim to the ‘modern’ lifestyle and mindset that the west snuck into Afrika, there is hope to be found in the regeneration of our bodies through the path of reconciliation with God and the use of the plants He prepared well in advance for our safety. There is hope to be found in reconnecting with each other and with the earth. There is also hope for the next generations to be found in those who were injured by the ‘modern’ system, in sharing their stories, advising the next generation on the paths to return to and watching over, supporting and ensuring this successful return. So that it may be well with Afrika.